Mate logo
Home
Apps
MacMac + SafariiOSiPhone + iPadChromeGoogle ChromeFirefoxMozilla FirefoxOperaOperaEdgeMicrosoft Edge
BlogHelp CenterContact
Apps

iPhone + iPad

Help Center, release notes, Download

Mac + Safari

Help Center, release notes, Download

Google Chrome

Help Center, Download

Mozilla Firefox

Help Center, Download

Opera

Help Center, Download

Microsoft Edge

Help Center, Download
Support
DownloadHelp CenterSupported languagesRequest a refundRestore passwordRestore serial codesPrivacy policy
STAY IN TOUCH
ContactTwitterBlog
Site language
free services
Web translatorVerb conjugatorDer Die Das lookupUsage examplesWordsDefinitionIdioms
Mate logo
Home
Apps
MacMac + SafariiOSiPhone + iPadChromeGoogle ChromeFirefoxMozilla FirefoxOperaOperaEdgeMicrosoft Edge
BlogHelp CenterContact
Apps

iPhone + iPad

Help Center, release notes, Download

Mac + Safari

Help Center, release notes, Download

Google Chrome

Help Center, Download

Mozilla Firefox

Help Center, Download

Opera

Help Center, Download

Microsoft Edge

Help Center, Download
Support
DownloadHelp CenterSupported languagesRequest a refundRestore passwordRestore serial codesPrivacy policy
STAY IN TOUCH
ContactTwitterBlog
Site language
free services
Web translatorVerb conjugatorDer Die Das lookupUsage examplesWordsDefinitionIdioms

Definition of "acephalous" in English

adjective

  1. Having no head.

  2. (zoology, applied to bivalve mollusks) Without a distinct head.

  3. (botany) Having the style spring from the base, instead of from the apex, as is the case in certain ovaries

  4. (social sciences, political science, sociology) A system of society without centralised state authority, where power is welded amongst groups of community entities e.g. clans. Without a leader or chief.

    • an acephalous society / community
  5. (prosody) Deficient in the beginning, as a line of poetry that is missing its expected opening syllable.

  6. Lacking the first portion of the text. (of a manuscript)

  7. (rare) Without a beginning.

    • 1828, Thomas de Quincey, review of Elements of Rhetoric by Richard Whately, in Blackwood’s Edinburgh Magazine, Volume 24, No. 147, December 1828, p. 905, Men wrote eloquently, because they wrote feelingly: they wrote idiomatically, because they wrote naturally, and without affectation: but if a false or acephalous structure of sentence,—if a barbarous idiom—or an exotic word happened to present itself, no writer of the 17th century seems to have had any such scrupulous sense of the dignity belonging to his own language, as should make it a duty to reject it, or worth his while to re-model a line.