Mate logo
主页
应用程序
MacMac + SafariiOSiPhone + iPadChromeGoogle ChromeFirefoxMozilla FirefoxOperaOperaEdgeMicrosoft Edge
博客帮助中心联系我们
应用程序

iPhone + iPad

帮助中心, 新版本推出通知, 下载

Mac + Safari

帮助中心, 新版本推出通知, 下载

Google Chrome

帮助中心, 下载

Mozilla Firefox

帮助中心, 下载

Opera

帮助中心, 下载

Microsoft Edge

帮助中心, 下载
支持
下载帮助中心支持的语言申请退款恢复密码恢复序列码隐私政策
保持联系
联系我们Twitter博客
语言
免费服务
网页翻译工具动词词形变化Der Die Das 查询Usage examplesWordsDefinitionIdioms
Mate logo
主页
应用程序
MacMac + SafariiOSiPhone + iPadChromeGoogle ChromeFirefoxMozilla FirefoxOperaOperaEdgeMicrosoft Edge
博客帮助中心联系我们
应用程序

iPhone + iPad

帮助中心, 新版本推出通知, 下载

Mac + Safari

帮助中心, 新版本推出通知, 下载

Google Chrome

帮助中心, 下载

Mozilla Firefox

帮助中心, 下载

Opera

帮助中心, 下载

Microsoft Edge

帮助中心, 下载
支持
下载帮助中心支持的语言申请退款恢复密码恢复序列码隐私政策
保持联系
联系我们Twitter博客
语言
免费服务
网页翻译工具动词词形变化Der Die Das 查询Usage examplesWordsDefinitionIdioms

Definition of "addibility" in 英语

noun

  1. Capability of addition; capability of being added to or added together.

    • 1690, John Locke, An Essay Concerning Human Understanding, London: Thomas Basset, Book 2, Chapter 28 “Of Clear and Obscure, Distinct and Confused Ideas,” p. 168, […] we have no more a clear Idea of infinite Parts in Matter, then we have a clear Idea of an infinite Number, by being able still to add new Numbers to any assigned Number we have: endless Divisibility giving us no more a clear and distinct Idea of actually infinite Parts, than endless Addibility (if I may so speak) gives us a clear and distinct Idea of an actually infinite Number:
    • 1731, Edmund Law, Notes in his translation of An Essay on the Origin of Evil by William King, Cambridge: W. Thurlbourn & J. Woodyer, Chapter 1, Section 3, p. 58, The generally receiv’d Notion of Eternity, as consisting in a continual addibility of successive Duration, is, I think, the very same thing as an infinite Series, and consequently liable to the same objections:
    • Late 18th–early 19th century, Jeremy Bentham, manuscript cited in Élie Halévy, La Formation du radicalisme philosophique, Paris: Félix Alcan, Volume 3, 1904, note 55, p. 481, ’Tis vain to talk of adding quantities which after the addition will continue distinct as they were before, one man’s happiness will never be another man’s happiness: a gain to one man is no gain to another: you might as well pretend to add 20 apples to 20 pears, after which you had done that could not be 40 of any one thing but 20 of each just as there was before. This addibility of happiness of different subjects, however when considered rigorously it may appear fictitious, is a postulation without the allowance of which all political reasoning is at a stand: